Eeva test: a method to optimize embryo selection

By (gynecologist), (embryologist), (embryologist) and (psychologist).
Last Update: 01/28/2022

The Eeva test, which stands for Early Embryo Viability Assessment (EVA), allows early prediction of which embryos have the greatest developmental potential.

In this way, a better selection of the embryo to be transferred to the maternal uterus can be made in order to improve the success rates of assisted reproduction treatments.

This is possible thanks to a time-lapse system attached to the incubator. It is a camera that takes serial images of the entire development of the embryo while it is inside the incubator. Time-lapse allows for continuous monitoring of embryos, but also to maintain much more stable conditions necessary for embryo development. This is because time-lapse avoids having to remove the embryo from the incubator to observe and evaluate it under the microscope as with traditional incubators.

What is the Eeva test?

It is a tool that predicts the developmental potential of embryos, which is very useful when choosing the embryo to transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

Eeva uses an algorithm that takes into account the time at which the first embryonic divisions occur, which Eeva is able to detect automatically (although embryologist supervision is recommended). In order to do this, Eeva relies on serial photographs of the embryo's first days of life obtained with a time-lapse system.

Thus, on day 3 of embryo development, Eeva is able to predict which embryos are most likely to give rise to a blastocyst. Thus, this system helps the embryologist to select which embryo will be the candidate to transfer to the patient.

The Eeva system can be incorporated into a traditional incubator to capture serial images for analysis. However, the Eeva test can now be performed directly in Geri+ incubators.

If you want to know more about the Geri incubator, you can click here: What is the Geri and what advantages does it offer in assisted reproduction?

Traditional embryo selection

To understand the importance that Eeva can have in embryo selection, it is necessary to know how the selection of the embryo or embryos to be transferred to the woman's uterus is usually performed.

From the cohort of embryos available from a patient, the embryologist relies on a series of morphological parameters to establish a classification. This means that the embryologist observes certain characteristics of the embryo at specific moments of embryonic development, which will allow him to decide which embryo has a better quality to be transferred.

To perform this observation, it is necessary to remove the embryo from the incubator and take it to the microscope. Thus, the stable culture conditions in which the embryo is kept inside the incubator are interrupted.


In addition to the benefit of being able to assess embryo viability early, the Eeva system has other advantages, which are mentioned below.

Objective method of selection

Traditional embryo selection by morphology is subjective, which means that the evaluation of an embryo may be different depending on the embryologist who evaluates it.

However, the Eeva test allows an objective evaluation of embryos based on certain parameters included in its algorithm. Therefore, Eeva can reduce the variability of embryo evaluations among embryologists to predict developmental potential to blastocyst.

More stable conditions

Due to the time-lapse system, embryos do not have to leave the incubator to be evaluated under a microscope. This reduces its handling and the likelihood of an accident, but also allows the embryo to be unaffected by changes in culture conditions that occur during its conventional evaluation outside the incubator.

On the other hand, the time-lapse system allows continuous monitoring of the embryos; whereas conventional evaluation is performed only at certain specific moments of embryo development to avoid removing the embryo from the incubator. Therefore, much more information about embryonic development can be obtained with time-lapse systems.

Possibility of reducing multiple pregnancy

Since the Eeva system makes it possible to choose with greater certainty the embryo with the greatest developmental capacity, the tendency to transfer a single embryo to the patient is favored. This would lead to a reduction in the rate of multiple pregnancy, which is associated with risks for both mothers and babies.

Effectiveness of Eeva

Eeva has shown that, in conjunction with morphological selection, it is more effective in determining which embryos will be able to reach blastocyst than if analyzed by morphology alone. In addition, embryo evaluation with Eeva has also been shown to improve implantation and pregnancy rates.

However, some studies have observed no difference in pregnancy rates with the use of Eeva compared to the usual morphological selection method.

FAQs from users

What other types of incubators are available for embryo culture?

By Blanca Paraíso M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc. (gynecologist).

The first incubators for embryo culture were large and the embryos of all patients were stored in the same space. Therefore, when a patient's embryos had to be removed for microscopic viewing or transfer, the temperature and gas conditions were temporarily altered, and this could affect all the embryos.

More recently, "benchtop" or "sandwich" type incubators have been developed. These have individualized compartments for each patient, so that opening one does not affect the others. In addition, the culture conditions are much better than with the first incubators, as they work at low oxygen pressures, so they imitate the conditions of the human body much better. The difference between these incubators and the Embryoscope® or other types of time-lapse incubators is that they do not have a built-in camera, so if you want to monitor the development of the embryos you need to remove them from the incubator to look at them under the microscope.

Are there other Time-Lapse incubators?

By Marta Barranquero Gómez B.Sc., M.Sc. (embryologist).

Yes, the most common Time-Lapse systems are currently classified into two types depending on the imaging system:

Built-in image system
Embryoscope, Geri, Miri and CCM.
Standalone image system
PrimoVisio and Eeva

Cada sistema Time-Lapse tiene sus propias ventajas y propiedades específicas, aunque disponer de cualquier información del desarrollo de los embriones permite una evaluación más precisa de los mismos. Así, se aumenta la tasa de implantación embrionaria y, por tanto, la probabilidad de embarazo.

What are the indications for the Eeva test?

By Silvia Azaña Gutiérrez B.Sc., M.Sc. (embryologist).

Eeva has no indication as to the characteristics of the patient or the IVF technique used. Any patient can benefit from its advantages.

What is the price of the Eeva test?

By Silvia Azaña Gutiérrez B.Sc., M.Sc. (embryologist).

The cost of embryo culture in time-lapse incubators is higher than if traditional incubators are used.

Time-lapse embryo culture usually involves an extra cost of 300-500 euros compared to the price with traditional culture. However, the exact price of time-lapse embryo culture will depend on each fertility clinic.

If you wish to obtain more information about embryo classification, you can click on the following link: Classification of embryos according to their day of development.

If, on the other hand, you are interested in time-lapse systems, we recommend you to read this article: What is time-lapse - Enhancement of in vitro embryo development

We make a great effort to provide you with the highest quality information.

🙏 Please share this article if you liked it. 💜💜 You help us continue!


Adamson GD, Abusief ME, Palao L, Witmer J, Palao LM, Gvakharia M. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):369-75.e6.

Aparicio-Ruiz B, Basile N, Pérez Albalá S, Bronet F, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1379-1385.e10.

Conaghan J, Chen AA, Willman SP, Ivani K, Chenette PE, Boostanfar R, Baker VL, Adamson GD, Abusief ME, Gvakharia M, Loewke KE, Shen S. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):412-9.e5.

Diamond MP, Suraj V, Behnke EJ, Yang X, Angle MJ, Lambe-Steinmiller JC, Watterson R, Athayde Wirka K, Chen AA, Shen S. Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Jan;32(1):61-8.

Kaser DJ, Bormann CL, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES, Racowsky C. A pilot randomized controlled trial of Day 3 single embryo transfer with adjunctive time-lapse selection versus Day 5 single embryo transfer with or without adjunctive time-lapse selection. Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1598-1603.

Kaser DJ, Farland LV, Missmer SA, Racowsky C. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo. Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1604-1611.

Kieslinger DC, De Gheselle S, Lambalk CB, De Sutter P, Kostelijk EH, Twisk JW, van Rijswijk J, Van den Abbeel E, Vergouw CG. Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2450-2457.

Revelli A, Canosa S, Carosso A, Filippini C, Paschero C, Gennarelli G, Delle Piane L, Benedetto C. Impact of the addition of Early Embryo Viability Assessment to morphological evaluation on the accuracy of embryo selection on day 3 or day 5: a retrospective analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2019 Aug 9;12(1):73.

Rocafort E, Enciso M, Leza A, Sarasa J, Aizpurua J. Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Sep;35(9):1573-1583.

VerMilyea MD, Tan L, Anthony JT, Conaghan J, Ivani K, Gvakharia M, Boostanfar R, Baker VL, Suraj V, Chen AA, Mainigi M, Coutifaris C, Shen S. Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):729-36.

FAQs from users: 'What other types of incubators are available for embryo culture?', 'Are there other Time-Lapse incubators?', 'What are the indications for the Eeva test?' and 'What is the price of the Eeva test?'.

Read more

Authors and contributors

 Blanca Paraíso
Blanca Paraíso
M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc.
Bachelor's Degree in Medicine and Ph.D from the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM). Postgraduate Course in Statistics of Health Sciences. Doctor specialized in Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Assisted Procreation. More information about Blanca Paraíso
License: 454505579
 Marta Barranquero Gómez
Marta Barranquero Gómez
B.Sc., M.Sc.
Graduated in Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences by the University of Valencia (UV) and specialized in Assisted Reproduction by the University of Alcalá de Henares (UAH) in collaboration with Ginefiv and in Clinical Genetics by the University of Alcalá de Henares (UAH). More information about Marta Barranquero Gómez
License: 3316-CV
 Silvia Azaña Gutiérrez
Silvia Azaña Gutiérrez
B.Sc., M.Sc.
Graduate in Health Biology from the University of Alcalá and specialized in Clinical Genetics from the same university. Master in Assisted Reproduction by the University of Valencia in collaboration with IVI clinics. More information about Silvia Azaña Gutiérrez
License: 3435-CV
Adapted into english by:
 Cristina  Algarra Goosman
Cristina Algarra Goosman
B.Sc., M.Sc.
Graduated in Psychology by the University of Valencia (UV) and specialized in Clinical Psychology by the European University Center and specific training in Infertility: Legal, Medical and Psychosocial Aspects by University of Valencia (UV) and ADEIT.
More information about Cristina Algarra Goosman
Member number: CV16874

Find the latest news on assisted reproduction in our channels.